Government operations
Local agencies: nondisclosure agreements
California bars local officials and employees from using public-business NDAs to withhold information from the officials or governing bodies they serve.
The law aims to prevent confidentiality agreements from blocking internal oversight and decision-making at local governments. Officials who violate the rule must disclose the NDA’s existence and step aside from related matters.
What the law does
- Prohibits local agency officials from entering or requesting public-business NDAs that stop them from sharing information with colleagues on the same local body.
- Prohibits local employees and officials from entering or requesting public-business NDAs that stop sharing information with the official or governing body they serve.
- Makes covered NDAs entered into or requested on or after January 1, 2027, void and unenforceable.
- Requires a violating official to disclose the NDA’s existence and recuse from related matters; violations involving peer-sharing restrictions also bar voting, deliberating, or influencing related decisions.
- Applies disclosure and recusal requirements to covered NDAs made before January 1, 2027.
- Exempts NDAs approved in advance by a unanimous vote of nonrecused governing-body members, certain disputes with adverse interests, and attorney-client privileged or confidential attorney work product.
Who it affects
- Elected and appointed local officials, local employees, and local board and commission members.
- Cities, counties, special districts, school districts, county offices of education, charter schools, local agency formation commissions, and joint powers authorities in specified disputes.
Context
The law does not authorize officials to use NDAs to withhold information from the public.